My Research over Seminole Wars

The Seminole Wars U. S. narrative 1301. 046 Carissa Farley Professor Rumanuk April 3, 2013 The Seminole Wars was one of galore(postnominal) wars fought during our nations history. Some of the wars in our history were fought over Indian Removal. fit to Ron Soodalter, The bit Seminole War erupted over abject treaties that repeatedly changed the boundaries of the Seminole reservation and fin comp every last(predicate)owelyy want to push the Seminoles out of Florida altogether.That sounds a little harsh to try and tally the drop of the Indian kinfolks. except that is fair the way things were back past. Back thusly the Indians were considered one of the get together States biggest enemies. The U. S army and the Seminoles fought three wars between 1816 and 1858. One of these wars that were fought was the mo Seminole War. The war was fought for seven years. But the Second Seminole War, fought from 1835-1842 cost upward of 530 million-more than the annual federal official budget at the time-and leaveed in the deaths of well 1,500 soldiers (mostly from disease), the forced removal from Florida of between 3,000 and 4,000 Seminoles, and the deaths of unmeasured others. Some wonder why all these deaths happened and it all comes trim back to the military outline and stopping the spread of disease. There were sight who argued the inclinework forcet of the Seminole Indians. Two beta people that opposed the relocation were twain Seminole gaffers call ind Osceola and Micanopy.They both planned the effort against relocation barely were defeated by a U. S commander by the name of doubting Thomas Sidney Jesup. Jesups tactics wore d own the Seminoles and in the end helped the United States purport the Seminoles out of Florida. The people who didnt oppose the removal of Indians include death chair Andrew capital of Mississippi, Zachary Taylor, Thomas Jesup, Duncan Clinch, and most of the United States. The war was started cod to a conflict that w as the direct result of the nations unbridled believe for territorial expansion, and of President Andrew capital of Mississippis Indian removal polity. According to the establishment of the United States all men be created equal. So shouldnt that include Indians? eyesight as how we atomic number 18 treating them as the enemy, I dont think that the Indians were included as part of the all men are created equal line of the constitution. notwithstanding some people would say that the Indians are the enemy and should be treated horribly. capital of Mississippi believed Indians posed a threat to the two-eyed violet and tranquility of the American nation and should be relocated or eliminated.He formalized his policy in 1830, selling his concept to Congress, which passed the Indian Removal Act by the narrowest of margins. over the next few years capital of Mississippi continued his campaign to re mint the fin Civilized Tribes- the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole- and drive them west of the Mississippi. The Indians were shared in what to do. Some chose to use non-violence age others decided to go to the Supreme Courts and let the Courts decide what to do. The courts ruled in choose of the Indians and that caused a problem for Georgia.Georgia went to Jackson and Jackson told Georgia to ignore the ruling. Georgia and Jackson decided to ignore the courts ruling. Because of this the Cherokee Indians were removed in an event called the cut across of Tears. In 1834 Jackson had his sights set on Florida and the Seminoles. Eleven years earlier the agreement of Moultrie Creek had directed the Seminoles to drop out all land claims in the territory and move to a 4-million-acre reservation in commutation Florida. It also bound them to remain serene and to apprehend all runaway sorry slaves and other fugitives for the brass.For its part the government would set up cattle and hogs, an animal annuity of $5,000, an interpreter, a blacksmith, and an Indian cistron, and keep all whites from impinge on Indian Land- the latter an unenforceable provision. The agreement came with a 20-year shelf life. unluckily Jackson broke the agreement and sign another agreement that would force the Seminoles to move to the Arkansas territory within a three year period and surrender all black runaway slaves. I feel care this is violating laws. It is violating treaty laws but making a previous treaty not being upheld.On the other travel by it makes the United States gain more land. I dont agree with President Jacksons way of removing Indians and taking all the slaves back but to be fair Jackson harbored a person-to-person resentment towards the Seminoles for their practice of sheltering and adopting runaway slaves into the tribe. However his resentment is violating a persons right to having the freedom to make their own decisions. According to several Army officers chip in at the treaty negotiations, the Indians had been wheedled an d bullied into signing. The government tried to justify why they did what they did to the Indians ut the truth is they violated civil freedoms. A turning point in the war happened in late 1835 when the hawkish Seminoles judged one chief who had agreed to relocate one two-timer to the tribe, and Osceola killed him. It soon became clear war would come-and soon. unluckily Osceola killed the Indian agent on declination 28 and anyone in the cabin. He accordingly took treasure from the agents cabin. To me this looks like Osceola is out for blood but he isnt. He is trying to protect his tribe from suffering having to move away from their homes. The agents death was avenged by Jesup.Osceola died from Malaria in prison. The war went on in a bloody fashion until it was lastly ended by all of the Seminoles overtaking to Arkansas and Florida being given to the United States. Jacksons prejudice towards the Indians didnt help. In the midst of the War of 1812, Jackson, then in charge of the Tennessee militia, was sent into southern Alabama, where he ruthlessly put mess an uprising of Creek Indians. The Creeks soon ceded two-thirds of their land to the United States. Jackson later routed bands of Seminoles from their sanctuaries in Spanish owned Florida. Bibliography SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. military account statement 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 62-69. academician attend Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). Outline of the United States tarradiddle &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212 1 . 1 SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. soldiery memoir 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 63. academic explore Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). 2 . SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. armed forces tarradiddle 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 64. donnish chase Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). 3 . SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. armed forces History 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 64. faculty member research Com plete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). 4 . SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. legions History 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 64. pedantic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). 5 . SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. war machine History 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 64. academician Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). 6 . SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. war machine History 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 65.Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). 7 . SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. Military History 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 65. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). 8 . SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. Military History 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 65. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). 9 . SOODALTER, RON. ON REMOVING SEMINOLES. Military History 29, no. 2 (July 2012) 66. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed April 2, 2013). 10 . Outline of the United States History (Unknown dates and author)