Angry fans of the hit television series The manner of walking wild ar sounding off in social media circles, upset that the submit ended its gentle in such mediocre demeanor and essentially violated its contract with fans by getting release of popular fictional characters in a disrespectful manner, keeping dislike characters around too long and by starting and windup the third temper in that awful prison. Words same(p) "ambiguous," "anti-climatic," and 'disappointed" cause dominated the trending #WalkingDead conversation on Twitter, while on The Walking Dead's Facebook page fans are arguing over the last, the offense obvious on both sides of the coin.
One fan in particular, Joseph Tomaselli, echoed this remonstrate in unrivalled of The Walking Dead's own posts, a gloss that had attracted over 115 likes as of Monday afternoon:
1) The Walking Dead started Season 3 at the prison and in a disappointment to many fans also ended this season at the same, stale prison: so ofttimes for brainstorming and creativity! After two seasons of scenery change, Season 3 should have set us up for something new to look ship to and failing to do so hindered the plot line.
2) They killed off Andrea in a compassionate manner. What, we were supposed to awe about her? found on her backstabbing and weak, no-backbone style, and the fact that she continually slept with the enemy, Andrea merited to die a horrible decease. The Walking Dead fans deserved to see this hated character go down in flames, rather than with sympathy. This character kill-off shows a lack of understanding by the drop a liners with the show's audience. Did they really envisage there was sympathy in the fan base for Andrea?
3) Merle's death received only five seconds of mention in the season finale, something that was only communicated between two people, as if nobody else on the show was even notified of his emotional departure safe one episode prior. It's as if this character never existed, never had an partake on the other characters and was just a "bit player," in the grand scheme of the show, which is the farthest thing from the truth. Merle's character deserved more respect.
4) Clearly, The Walking Dead has been suffering all season long with internal struggles, evidenced by the hasty sacking of its show runners and veteran writers. This season's character development pretty much ceased to exist at the mid-point of the season and never recovered. Merle's parting, as mentioned above is but just one character fail of The Walking Dead, Season 3.
The fact that the show's most popular character, Daryl, didn't dominate the finale is proof that the show's writers are now missing the boat, where in Seasons 1 and 2 they were on the money with character development. Daryl's brother was killed in the finale and Daryl doesn't even get a shot at revenge? Not even an opportunity? Cookie-cutter characters do not a show make.
5) Reminding viewers during every technical break that "The Talking Dead" with Chris Hardwick is "coming on near" is a constant reminder how uncool the show has sound in Season 3. What is this, The Bachelor? The Walking Dead fans don't unavoidableness endless reminders that AMC's paid actors and guests are ready to dissect what we just saw and then try to explain why we should care about those scenes. And of course, why we should tune in next season.
As a fan of The Walking Dead's first two seasons it pains me to write these words, to slam the very show I fell in love with. That being said, am I wrong? Am I misreading these cues? I hope so. I'd love aught more than to see The Walking Dead make a strong comeback next fall for Season 4. Unfortunately, I fear the show lost a good share of its audience in Season 3.
Materials taken from The Huffington Post
No comments:
Post a Comment